StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
GLIBK$22.06-1.39%
Fair $22.06+0.0%

GLIBK

Liberty Capital Corporation

Communication Services / Telecom ServicesNasdaqGS

$22.06

-0.31 (-1.39%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $22.06Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 23/D
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $54.0M · quality 62.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 59/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

23/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -18.3%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · GLIBKLocal privado en este navegador · Liberty Capital Corporation
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$880M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-18.3%

↓

Gross Margin

73.4%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.62

↑
52-Week Range$22
$21$41

TradingView lightweight chart

GLIBK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $22.06Periodo -29.1%
Fair value: $22.06

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+2.6%

FCF CAGR

+50.3%

FCF margin

12.8%

FCF / Net income

-0.39x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $952.0M · net income $-309.0M · FCF $122.0M

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

73.4%+3.5% pts

Operating margin

18.7%+6.3% pts

Net margin

-32.5%-37.0% pts

FCF margin

12.8%+6.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$952.0M$952.0M$940.0M$904.0M
Net Income$-309.0M$-309.0M$70.0M$41.0M
EBITDA$-79.0M$-79.0M$405.0M$346.0M
EPS-9.97-9.972.291.34
Gross Margin73.4%73.4%70.3%69.9%
Operating Margin18.7%18.7%14.9%12.4%
Net Margin-32.5%-32.5%7.4%4.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.620.620.810.74
Current Ratio3.313.31——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$122.0M$122.0M$31.0M$54.0M
Returns
ROE-18.3%-18.3%5.0%2.8%
Valuation
P/B0.410.41——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth1.3%1.3%4.0%—
EPS Growth-535.3%-535.3%70.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -29.1%

Total return

-29.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

2.29 → -9.97

Residual

-29.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-29.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.