StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
GLOBALLOG.BO$160.00-3.03%
Fair $160.00+0.0%

GLOBALLOG.BO

GLOBALLOG.BO

Industrials / Marine ShippingBSE

$160.00

-5.00 (-3.03%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $160.00Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 52/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-18.4M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 13/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

52/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · GLOBALLOG.BOLocal privado en este navegador · GLOBALLOG.BO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.3B

P/E

16.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

15.4x

↑

ROE

19.6%

↑

Gross Margin

7.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$160
$79$173

TradingView lightweight chart

GLOBALLOG.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $160.00Periodo +101.8%
Fair value: $160.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+3.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-5.4%

FCF / Net income

-1.10x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $2.08B · net income $102.4M · FCF $-113.0M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

7.9%+3.9% pts

Operating margin

5.1%+3.0% pts

Net margin

4.9%+2.9% pts

FCF margin

-5.4%-5.2% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$2.08B$2.08B$1.91B$1.02B$1.88B
Net Income$102.4M$102.4M$68.2M$26.3M$38.3M
EBITDA$140.1M$140.1M$94.0M$40.4M$51.7M
EPS——4.721.822.65
Gross Margin7.9%7.9%7.1%6.4%4.0%
Operating Margin5.1%5.1%4.3%2.8%2.2%
Net Margin4.9%4.9%3.6%2.6%2.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.070.470.91
Current Ratio4.504.50———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-113.0M$-113.0M$-18.4M$17.0M$-5.3M
Returns
ROE19.6%19.6%39.2%30.7%64.4%
Valuation
P/E16.4916.49———
EV/EBITDA15.4215.42———
P/B4.424.42———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth9.1%9.1%87.0%-45.9%—
EPS Growth——158.8%-31.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +101.8%

Total return

+101.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

4.72 → n/d

Residual

+101.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+101.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.