StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
GLOBECIVIL.BO$41.00+0.00%
Fair $41.00+0.0%

GLOBECIVIL.BO

GLOBECIVIL.BO

Industrials / Engineering & ConstructionBSE

$41.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $41.00Fund rank 20/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 34/D
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 35% · confianza 12%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-74.2M · quality 25.7/100

Data gap 20/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 10/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

34/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · GLOBECIVIL.BOLocal privado en este navegador · GLOBECIVIL.BO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.4B

P/E

16.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

8.3x

↓

ROE

19.8%

↑

Gross Margin

18.4%

↓

Debt/Equity

1.60

↑
52-Week Range$41
$33$95

TradingView lightweight chart

GLOBECIVIL.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $41.00Periodo -56.7%
Fair value: $41.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2024 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+7.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-2.2%

FCF / Net income

-0.48x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.32B · net income $153.8M · FCF $-74.2M

2022-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

18.4%+6.8% pts

Operating margin

12.4%+5.2% pts

Net margin

4.6%+2.8% pts

FCF margin

-2.2%-4.1% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$3.32B$3.32B$2.33B$2.86B
Net Income$153.8M$153.8M$48.5M$52.0M
EBITDA$446.8M$446.8M$198.6M$219.6M
EPS2.582.580.810.87
Gross Margin18.4%18.4%13.1%11.7%
Operating Margin12.4%12.4%7.7%7.1%
Net Margin4.6%4.6%2.1%1.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.601.601.561.23
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-74.2M$-74.2M$-151.5M$53.2M
Returns
ROE19.8%19.8%7.8%9.1%
Valuation
P/E15.9515.95——
EV/EBITDA8.278.27——
P/B3.153.15——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth42.3%42.3%-18.3%—
EPS Growth217.0%217.0%-6.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

12.2%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$3.64

Spread vs growth

204.8%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

11.3%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$4.40

Spread vs growth

205.7%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

10.7%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$7.09

Spread vs growth

206.3%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -56.7%

Total return

-56.7%

Start / end P/E

116.6x → 15.9x

EPS bridge

0.81 → 2.58

Residual

-187.4%

EPS growth+217.0%
Multiple rerating-86.3%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-187.4%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.