StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
GLUE$19.67-0.20%
Fair $19.67+0.0%

GLUE

Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc.

Healthcare / BiotechnologyNasdaqGS

$19.67

-0.04 (-0.20%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $19.67Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 30/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-27.5M · quality 67.7/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 42/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

30/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 6Warnings: 1unknown: 6
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists. ROE is -16.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · GLUELocal privado en este navegador · Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.7B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-16.6%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.17

↓
52-Week Range$20
$4$26

TradingView lightweight chart

GLUE price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $19.67Periodo -7.1%
Fair value: $19.67

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2020–2025 · 5 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-22.2%

FCF / Net income

0.71x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $123.7M · net income $-38.6M · FCF $-27.5M

2020-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

-43.8%— pts

Net margin

-31.2%— pts

FCF margin

-22.2%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Income Statement
Revenue$123.7M$123.7M$75.6M————
Net Income$-38.6M$-38.6M$-72.7M$-135.4M$-108.5M$-74.0M$-35.9M
EBITDA$-45.9M$-45.9M$-73.0M$-137.1M$-108.6M——
EPS——-1.18-2.63-2.30——
Operating Margin-43.8%-43.8%-107.3%————
Net Margin-31.2%-31.2%-96.1%————
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.170.170.190.260.17——
Current Ratio9.549.54—————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-27.5M$-27.5M$38.0M$-62.8M$-105.4M$-69.1M$-26.4M
Returns
ROE-16.6%-16.6%-32.6%-75.5%-40.0%-21.3%73.6%
Valuation
P/B5.535.531.981.581.39——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth63.5%63.5%—————
EPS Growth——55.1%-14.3%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +370.6%

Total return

+370.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-1.18 → n/d

Residual

+370.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+370.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.