StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
GRAMEVA.BO$86.96+5.00%
Fair $86.96+0.0%

GRAMEVA.BO

Grameva Limited

Consumer Defensive / Farm ProductsBSE

$86.96

+4.14 (+5.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $86.96Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 60/B
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 16%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $5.0M · quality 34.3/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 14/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

60/100

B

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · GRAMEVA.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Grameva Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$417M

P/E

13.8x

↓

EV/EBITDA

9.4x

↑

ROE

26.9%

↑

Gross Margin

8.6%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.88

↑
52-Week Range$87
$29$87

TradingView lightweight chart

GRAMEVA.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $86.96Periodo +471.4%
Fair value: $86.96

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+50.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-10.8%

FCF / Net income

-2.96x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $826.8M · net income $30.2M · FCF $-89.2M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

8.6%+1.8% pts

Operating margin

5.0%+4.9% pts

Net margin

3.6%+3.0% pts

FCF margin

-10.8%-9.6% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$826.8M$826.8M$414.1M$373.4M$244.6M
Net Income$30.2M$30.2M$4.9M$3.4M$1.7M
EBITDA$53.0M$53.0M$16.3M$12.5M$7.0M
EPS——1.020.720.36
Gross Margin8.6%8.6%6.2%6.2%6.8%
Operating Margin5.0%5.0%1.4%2.4%0.2%
Net Margin3.6%3.6%1.2%0.9%0.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.880.881.050.370.43
Current Ratio1.311.31———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-89.2M$-89.2M$15.6M$5.0M$-2.8M
Returns
ROE26.9%26.9%5.9%4.5%2.3%
Valuation
P/E13.8313.8356.6264.1153.08
EV/EBITDA9.429.4222.1019.8617.58
P/B3.723.723.372.871.23
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth99.7%99.7%10.9%52.6%—
EPS Growth——42.0%99.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +107.9%

Total return

+107.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.02 → n/d

Residual

+107.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+107.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.