StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
GRERENEW.BO$167.55+1.24%
Fair $167.55+0.0%

GRERENEW.BO

GRERENEW.BO

Technology / SolarBSE

$167.55

+2.05 (+1.24%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $167.55Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 62/B
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-4.1M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 11/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

62/100

B

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · GRERENEW.BOLocal privado en este navegador · GRERENEW.BO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.4B

P/E

13.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

11.1x

↓

ROE

17.0%

↑

Gross Margin

32.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$168
$78$178

TradingView lightweight chart

GRERENEW.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $167.55Periodo +83.7%
Fair value: $167.55

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+33.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-5.5%

FCF / Net income

-0.50x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.23B · net income $135.8M · FCF $-67.9M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

32.3%+19.9% pts

Operating margin

12.6%+8.9% pts

Net margin

11.0%+9.3% pts

FCF margin

-5.5%+1.1% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$1.23B$1.23B$837.2M$903.4M$522.2M
Net Income$135.8M$135.8M$70.2M$99.1M$8.9M
EBITDA$190.1M$190.1M$101.4M$132.7M$21.8M
EPS——4.926.930.62
Gross Margin32.3%32.3%23.8%18.3%12.4%
Operating Margin12.6%12.6%10.9%12.4%3.7%
Net Margin11.0%11.0%8.4%11.0%1.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.020.050.220.43
Current Ratio3.193.19———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-67.9M$-67.9M$-4.1M$44.3M$-34.6M
Returns
ROE17.0%17.0%22.5%47.1%8.0%
Valuation
P/E13.5013.50———
EV/EBITDA11.0711.07———
P/B3.013.01———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth46.8%46.8%-7.3%73.0%—
EPS Growth——-29.1%1009.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +83.7%

Total return

+83.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

4.92 → n/d

Residual

+83.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+83.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.