StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
GUTS$0.81-6.75%
Fair $0.81+0.0%

GUTS

Fractyl Health, Inc.

Healthcare / BiotechnologyNasdaqGM

$0.81

-0.06 (-6.75%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.81Fund rank 22/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 20/D
F-Score: 2/9
High DebtLow Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 14%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-67.3M · quality 38.7/100

Data gap 22/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 33/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

20/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 2unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists. Debt-to-Equity ratio is 6.52, above the 2.0 threshold ROE is -14.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · GUTSLocal privado en este navegador · Fractyl Health, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$128M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-1490.3%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

6.52

↑
52-Week Range$1
$0$3

TradingView lightweight chart

GUTS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.808Periodo -93.7%
Fair value: $0.808

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

0.64x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $-141.0M · FCF $-90.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue——$93000.00$120000.00—
Net Income$-141.0M$-141.0M$-68.7M$-77.1M$-46.5M
EBITDA$-95.7M$-95.7M$-92.9M$-50.5M$-48.9M
EPS-0.92-0.92-1.62-1.98-1.34
Gross Margin——46.2%35.8%—
Operating Margin——-100571.0%-42363.3%—
Net Margin——-73864.5%-64242.5%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity6.526.522.20-0.27-0.08
Current Ratio4.284.28———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-90.9M$-90.9M$-67.3M$-43.2M$-46.3M
Returns
ROE-1490.3%-1490.3%-241.7%23.7%18.4%
Valuation
P/B13.1113.113.37——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth——-22.5%——
EPS Growth43.3%43.3%18.3%-48.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -57.4%

Total return

-57.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-1.62 → -0.92

Residual

-57.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-57.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.