StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
HARSHDEEP.BO$81.09+1.26%
Fair $81.09+0.0%

HARSHDEEP.BO

Harshdeep Hortico Limited

Consumer Cyclical / Furnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesBSE

$81.09

+1.01 (+1.26%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $81.09Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 45/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-49.4M · quality 44.0/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 11/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

45/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · HARSHDEEP.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Harshdeep Hortico Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.3B

P/E

10.4x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.7x

↓

ROE

20.9%

↑

Gross Margin

47.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.06

↓
52-Week Range$81
$73$116

TradingView lightweight chart

HARSHDEEP.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $81.09Periodo +21.9%
Fair value: $81.09

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-7.2%

FCF / Net income

-0.39x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $687.1M · net income $125.2M · FCF $-49.4M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

47.2%— pts

Operating margin

23.8%— pts

Net margin

18.2%— pts

FCF margin

-7.2%— pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$687.1M$687.1M$562.7M$482.5M—
Net Income$125.2M$125.2M$97.0M$65.5M$-27000.00
EBITDA$197.8M$197.8M$149.6M$107.7M$-27000.00
EPS——6.035.25-0.00
Gross Margin47.2%47.2%45.9%40.8%—
Operating Margin23.8%23.8%20.0%19.0%—
Net Margin18.2%18.2%17.2%13.6%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.060.06———
Current Ratio3.313.31———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-49.4M$-49.4M$4.8M$-270.1M$-11000.00
Returns
ROE20.9%20.9%20.5%17.6%-5.7%
Valuation
P/E10.4210.4211.119.62—
EV/EBITDA6.746.747.065.69—
P/B2.182.182.271.70—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth22.1%22.1%16.6%——
EPS Growth——14.9%312972.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +3.9%

Total return

+3.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

6.03 → n/d

Residual

+3.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+3.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.