StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
HC.V$0.07+0.00%
Fair $0.07+0.0%

HC.V

Hypercharge Networks Corp.

Consumer Cyclical / Auto PartsTSXV

$0.07

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.07Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 19/F
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-4.7M · quality 51.3/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 15/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

19/100

F

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -6.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · HC.VLocal privado en este navegador · Hypercharge Networks Corp.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$10M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-691.0%

↓

Gross Margin

22.6%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.08

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

HC.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.075Periodo -87.1%
Fair value: $0.075

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-24.2%

FCF / Net income

0.57x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $10.1M · net income $-4.3M · FCF $-2.4M

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

22.6%— pts

Operating margin

-42.9%— pts

Net margin

-42.7%— pts

FCF margin

-24.2%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$10.1M$10.1M$3.1M$484218.00—
Net Income$-4.3M$-4.3M$-8.0M$-9.6M$-878041.00
EBITDA$-4.0M$-4.0M$-7.9M$-9.5M$-877891.00
EPS-0.06-0.06-0.12-0.16-0.02
Gross Margin22.6%22.6%32.1%34.8%—
Operating Margin-42.9%-42.9%-264.4%-887.7%—
Net Margin-42.7%-42.7%-260.4%-1991.1%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.080.080.070.04—
Current Ratio2.012.01———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.4M$-2.4M$-5.5M$-4.7M$-386409.00
Returns
ROE-691.0%-691.0%-228.3%-121.1%-39.1%
Valuation
P/B8.638.633.57——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth227.3%227.3%534.4%——
EPS Growth50.0%50.0%23.7%-674.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +7.1%

Total return

+7.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.12 → -0.06

Residual

+7.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+7.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.