StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
HIPERMARC.SN$14.49+0.00%
Fair $14.49+0.0%

HIPERMARC.SN

Hipermarc S.A.

Consumer Cyclical / Department StoresSantiago

$14.49

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $14.49Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 51/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $5.3B · quality 54.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 24/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

51/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · HIPERMARC.SNLocal privado en este navegador · Hipermarc S.A.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$18.3B

P/E

2.6x

↓

EV/EBITDA

1.5x

↓

ROE

6.8%

↑

Gross Margin

12.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$14
$11$20

TradingView lightweight chart

HIPERMARC.SN price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $16.09Periodo -50.2%
Fair value: $14.49

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+46.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

3.0%

FCF / Net income

0.75x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $175.12B · net income $7.09B · FCF $5.29B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

12.9%-7.8% pts

Operating margin

1.6%-3.9% pts

Net margin

4.0%-6.4% pts

FCF margin

3.0%+78.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$175.12B$175.12B$141.40B$76.30B$55.40B
Net Income$7.09B$7.09B$-5.62B$7.22B$5.77B
EBITDA$9.46B$9.46B$-3.81B$8.76B$8.51B
EPS——-4.455.744.59
Gross Margin12.9%12.9%18.5%19.7%20.8%
Operating Margin1.6%1.6%6.8%5.8%5.5%
Net Margin4.0%4.0%-4.0%9.5%10.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.010.01—
Current Ratio1.491.49———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$5.29B$5.29B$-7.98B$22.76B$-42.06B
Returns
ROE6.8%6.8%-5.5%7.8%6.5%
Valuation
P/E2.582.58—0.590.73
EV/EBITDA1.501.50—-0.060.01
P/B0.170.170.110.050.05
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth23.8%23.8%85.3%37.7%—
EPS Growth——-177.5%25.2%—
Dividend Yield7.0%7.0%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +24.4%

Total return

+24.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-4.45 → n/d

Residual

+17.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+7.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+17.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.