StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
HKPD$0.55+4.74%
Fair $0.55+0.0%

HKPD

Cellyan Biotechnology Co., Ltd

Healthcare / Medical DistributionNasdaqCM

$0.55

+0.02 (+4.74%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.55Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 28/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $414226.00 · quality 39.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 19/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

28/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists. ROE is -0.5%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · HKPDLocal privado en este navegador · Cellyan Biotechnology Co., Ltd
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$13M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

6.0x

↓

ROE

-0.5%

↓

Gross Margin

11.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.48

↑
52-Week Range$1
$0$3

TradingView lightweight chart

HKPD price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.550Periodo -80.5%
Fair value: $0.550

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+27.2%

FCF CAGR

-49.3%

FCF margin

2.0%

FCF / Net income

-15.31x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $20.3M · net income $-27056.0 · FCF $414226.0

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

11.9%-9.9% pts

Operating margin

1.0%-7.6% pts

Net margin

-0.1%-8.1% pts

FCF margin

2.0%-10.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$20.3M$20.3M$16.7M$12.6M
Net Income$-27056.00$-27056.00$1.3M$998196.00
EBITDA$1.2M$1.2M$2.5M$1.8M
EPS-0.00-0.000.120.09
Gross Margin11.9%11.9%21.3%21.8%
Operating Margin1.0%1.0%10.0%8.6%
Net Margin-0.1%-0.1%8.0%7.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.480.480.491.18
Current Ratio2.932.93——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$414226.00$414226.00$-482348.00$1.6M
Returns
ROE-0.5%-0.5%31.3%170.6%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA6.006.00——
P/B1.121.12——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth21.7%21.7%32.9%—
EPS Growth-102.5%-102.5%33.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -53.0%

Total return

-53.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.12 → -0.00

Residual

-53.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-53.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.