StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
HULT-B.ST$3.37-6.39%
Fair $3.37+0.0%

HULT-B.ST

Hultstrom Group AB (publ)

Industrials / Engineering & ConstructionStockholm

$3.37

-0.23 (-6.39%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $3.37Fund rank 37/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 56/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $23.5M · quality 76.3/100

Data gap 37/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 71/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

56/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · HULT-B.STLocal privado en este navegador · Hultstrom Group AB (publ)
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$205M

P/E

14.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.3x

↓

ROE

15.0%

↑

Gross Margin

77.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.14

↓
52-Week Range$3
$3$4

TradingView lightweight chart

HULT-B.ST price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $3.370Periodo -91.9%
Fair value: $3.370

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+1.6%

FCF CAGR

+51.0%

FCF margin

9.2%

FCF / Net income

2.16x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $310.4M · net income $13.2M · FCF $28.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

77.2%+5.9% pts

Operating margin

8.1%+7.0% pts

Net margin

4.2%+3.3% pts

FCF margin

9.2%+6.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$310.4M$310.4M$328.3M$308.6M$296.2M
Net Income$13.2M$13.2M$25.7M$12.7M$2.9M
EBITDA$32.7M$32.7M$36.9M$28.0M$16.5M
EPS——0.420.210.05
Gross Margin77.2%77.2%72.6%72.3%71.3%
Operating Margin8.1%8.1%8.1%5.6%1.2%
Net Margin4.2%4.2%7.8%4.1%1.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.140.140.170.610.62
Current Ratio2.222.22———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$28.5M$28.5M$23.5M$14.1M$8.3M
Returns
ROE15.0%15.0%29.9%21.2%6.1%
Valuation
P/E14.0414.047.6211.7149.20
EV/EBITDA6.256.255.596.5110.48
P/B2.332.332.272.493.13
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-5.5%-5.5%6.4%4.2%—
EPS Growth——100.0%320.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -7.9%

Total return

-7.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.42 → n/d

Residual

-7.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-7.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.