StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
HXHX$0.45-10.00%
Fair $0.45+0.0%

HXHX

Haoxin Holdings Limited

Industrials / Integrated Freight & LogisticsNasdaqCM

$0.45

-0.05 (-10.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.45Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 42/C
F-Score: 1/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-4.0M · quality 39.7/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 6/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

42/100

C

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · HXHXLocal privado en este navegador · Haoxin Holdings Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$6M

P/E

1.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

2.5x

↓

ROE

14.4%

↑

Gross Margin

25.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.42

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$2

TradingView lightweight chart

HXHX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.450Periodo -85.5%
Fair value: $0.450

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+4.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-42.4%

FCF / Net income

-3.53x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $33.0M · net income $4.0M · FCF $-14.0M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

25.1%-1.6% pts

Operating margin

23.6%+2.1% pts

Net margin

12.0%-2.8% pts

FCF margin

-42.4%-40.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$33.0M$33.0M$25.6M$26.7M$28.9M
Net Income$4.0M$4.0M$3.2M$4.0M$4.3M
EBITDA$6.5M$6.5M$5.2M$6.2M$7.0M
EPS——0.230.260.29
Gross Margin25.1%25.1%25.4%25.7%26.7%
Operating Margin23.6%23.6%21.7%22.5%21.4%
Net Margin12.0%12.0%12.4%14.9%14.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.420.420.190.230.20
Current Ratio2.372.37———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-14.0M$-14.0M$-4.0M$921339.00$-500620.00
Returns
ROE14.4%14.4%17.3%25.3%34.6%
Valuation
P/E1.501.50———
EV/EBITDA2.552.55———
P/B0.220.22———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth29.2%29.2%-4.1%-7.9%—
EPS Growth——-12.8%-7.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -73.1%

Total return

-73.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.23 → n/d

Residual

-73.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-73.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.