StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ILA.AX$0.36-5.19%
Fair $0.36+0.0%

ILA.AX

Island Pharmaceuticals Limited

Healthcare / BiotechnologyASX

$0.36

-0.02 (-5.19%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.36Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 23/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-2.7M · quality 68.7/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 33/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

23/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists. ROE is -1.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · ILA.AXLocal privado en este navegador · Island Pharmaceuticals Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$108M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-188.6%

↓

Gross Margin

100.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.28

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

ILA.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.365Periodo -30.5%
Fair value: $0.365

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-252.9%

FCF / Net income

1.10x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.3M · net income $-2.9M · FCF $-3.2M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

100.0%— pts

Operating margin

-229.6%— pts

Net margin

-228.9%— pts

FCF margin

-252.9%— pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$1.3M$1.3M$11065.00——
Net Income$-2.9M$-2.9M$-2.8M$-2.6M$-2.1M
EBITDA$-2.8M$-2.8M$-2.8M$-2.8M$-2.1M
EPS-0.03-0.03-0.03-0.03—
Gross Margin100.0%100.0%100.0%——
Operating Margin-229.6%-229.6%-26182.3%——
Net Margin-228.9%-228.9%-25580.2%——
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.280.28———
Current Ratio8.408.40———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.2M$-3.2M$-2.7M$-1.9M$-938236.00
Returns
ROE-188.6%-188.6%-158.5%-60.4%-33.2%
Valuation
P/B21.7021.705.882.723.82
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth11211.1%11211.1%———
EPS Growth1.9%1.9%-8.1%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +78.0%

Total return

+78.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.03 → -0.03

Residual

+78.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+78.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.