StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
IMCO.TA$5000.00-1.83%
Fair $5000.00+0.0%

IMCO.TA

IMCO Industries Ltd.

Industrials / Aerospace & DefenseTel Aviv

$5000.00

-93.00 (-1.83%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $5000.00Fund rank 22/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 36/D
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 14%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-7.1M · quality 33.7/100

Data gap 22/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 11/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

36/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · IMCO.TALocal privado en este navegador · IMCO Industries Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$252M

P/E

12.2x

↓

EV/EBITDA

559.2x

↑

ROE

16.8%

↑

Gross Margin

24.3%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.92

↑
52-Week Range$5000
$3985$12190

TradingView lightweight chart

IMCO.TA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $5,000Periodo +399.5%
Fair value: $5,000

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+15.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-2.0%

FCF / Net income

-0.33x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $354.6M · net income $21.2M · FCF $-7.1M

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

24.3%+5.4% pts

Operating margin

10.9%+3.7% pts

Net margin

6.0%+3.7% pts

FCF margin

-2.0%-9.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$354.6M$354.6M$303.1M$266.3M
Net Income$21.2M$21.2M$24.9M$6.2M
EBITDA$45.2M$45.2M$43.0M$27.4M
EPS——4.931.24
Gross Margin24.3%24.3%23.6%18.9%
Operating Margin10.9%10.9%11.4%7.3%
Net Margin6.0%6.0%8.2%2.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.920.920.79—
Current Ratio1.391.39——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-7.1M$-7.1M$-39.0M$19.1M
Returns
ROE16.8%16.8%21.0%—
Valuation
P/E12.1712.17687.421499.19
EV/EBITDA559.20559.20400.37340.33
P/B199.86199.86144.26—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth17.0%17.0%13.8%—
EPS Growth——297.6%—
Dividend Yield3.8%3.8%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +9.4%

Total return

+9.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

4.93 → n/d

Residual

+5.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.8%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+5.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.