StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
IMPP$5.26+2.94%
Fair $5.26+0.0%

IMPP

Imperial Petroleum Inc.

Energy / Oil & Gas MidstreamNasdaqCM

$5.26

+0.15 (+2.94%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $5.26Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 58/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 16%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $51.4M · quality 32.3/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 24/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

58/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · IMPPLocal privado en este navegador · Imperial Petroleum Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$238M

P/E

3.4x

↓

EV/EBITDA

2.4x

↓

ROE

9.4%

↑

Gross Margin

28.7%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$5
$3$7

TradingView lightweight chart

IMPP price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $5.260Periodo -95.3%
Fair value: $5.260

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+18.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

49.1%

FCF / Net income

1.58x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $161.0M · net income $50.0M · FCF $79.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

28.7%-4.9% pts

Operating margin

24.8%-6.0% pts

Net margin

31.0%+0.6% pts

FCF margin

49.1%+129.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$161.0M$161.0M$147.5M$183.7M$97.0M
Net Income$50.0M$50.0M$50.2M$71.1M$29.5M
EBITDA$78.2M$78.2M$71.0M$88.3M$43.4M
EPS1.291.291.402.932.85
Gross Margin28.7%28.7%34.2%39.9%33.6%
Operating Margin24.8%24.8%31.0%36.4%30.7%
Net Margin31.0%31.0%34.0%38.7%30.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity——0.00—0.25
Current Ratio5.785.78———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$79.1M$79.1M$3.0M$51.4M$-77.8M
Returns
ROE9.4%9.4%11.9%19.6%10.5%
Valuation
P/E3.373.372.330.981.28
EV/EBITDA2.362.361.520.742.34
P/B0.360.360.260.180.11
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth9.2%9.2%-19.7%89.4%—
EPS Growth-7.9%-7.9%-52.2%2.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-28.7%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.47

Spread vs growth

20.9%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-15.2%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.56

Spread vs growth

7.4%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

-3.4%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.91

Spread vs growth

-4.4%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +83.9%

Total return

+83.9%

Start / end P/E

2.0x → 4.1x

EPS bridge

1.40 → 1.29

Residual

-7.8%

EPS growth-7.9%
Multiple rerating+99.6%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-7.8%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.