StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
INDSOYA.BO$47.44+1.99%
Fair $47.44+0.0%

INDSOYA.BO

Apollo Ingredients Limited

Consumer Defensive / Packaged FoodsBSE

$47.44

+1.15 (+1.99%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $47.44Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 48/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $888000.00 · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 11/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

48/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · INDSOYA.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Apollo Ingredients Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$493M

P/E

15.6x

↑

EV/EBITDA

49.4x

↑

ROE

10.1%

↑

Gross Margin

36.7%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$47
$5$59

TradingView lightweight chart

INDSOYA.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $58.91Periodo +685.5%
Fair value: $47.44

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

-10.6%

FCF margin

1.8%

FCF / Net income

0.13x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $49.0M · net income $7.1M · FCF $888000.0

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

36.7%— pts

Operating margin

16.8%— pts

Net margin

14.5%— pts

FCF margin

1.8%— pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$49.0M$49.0M$30.7M$10.0M—
Net Income$7.1M$7.1M$976000.00$609210.00$-732480.00
EBITDA$9.2M$9.2M$1.3M$793260.00$-1.0M
EPS——2.440.86-1.04
Gross Margin36.7%36.7%22.8%26.0%—
Operating Margin16.8%16.8%4.1%7.9%—
Net Margin14.5%14.5%3.2%6.1%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.00———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$888000.00$888000.00$-1.2M$14.7M$1.2M
Returns
ROE10.1%10.1%7.6%5.2%-6.5%
Valuation
P/E15.5515.553.7310.56—
EV/EBITDA49.4549.45-7.28-13.09—
P/B7.067.060.500.540.57
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth59.4%59.4%207.5%——
EPS Growth——183.2%183.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +547.4%

Total return

+547.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

2.44 → n/d

Residual

+547.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+547.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.