StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
INIK.V$0.06+37.50%
Fair $0.06+0.0%

INIK.V

Ionik Corporation

Communication Services / Advertising AgenciesTSXV

$0.06

+0.02 (+37.50%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.06Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 35/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $9.2M · quality 58.0/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 41/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

35/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · INIK.VLocal privado en este navegador · Ionik Corporation
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$20M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

9.0x

↑

ROE

62.1%

↑

Gross Margin

40.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

-2.14

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

INIK.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.055Periodo -93.8%
Fair value: $0.055

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+36.6%

FCF CAGR

+106.2%

FCF margin

17.4%

FCF / Net income

-1.00x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $195.3M · net income $-33.9M · FCF $33.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

40.9%-6.3% pts

Operating margin

6.8%+6.5% pts

Net margin

-17.4%-9.7% pts

FCF margin

17.4%+12.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$195.3M$195.3M$168.1M$140.4M$76.6M
Net Income$-33.9M$-33.9M$-12.3M$-54.3M$-5.9M
EBITDA$13.9M$13.9M$16.1M$-32.3M$5.4M
EPS-0.10-0.10-0.09-0.22-0.03
Gross Margin40.9%40.9%38.3%39.5%47.2%
Operating Margin6.8%6.8%3.2%1.6%0.3%
Net Margin-17.4%-17.4%-7.3%-38.7%-7.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-2.14-2.14-6.56103.820.62
Current Ratio0.200.20———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$33.9M$33.9M$7.4M$9.2M$3.9M
Returns
ROE62.1%62.1%60.7%-5976.6%-7.7%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA9.039.039.24—18.46
P/B———60.230.78
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth16.2%16.2%19.7%83.2%—
EPS Growth-11.1%-11.1%59.1%-633.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -56.0%

Total return

-56.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.09 → -0.10

Residual

-56.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-56.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.