StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ININ.OL$3.10+0.00%
Fair $3.10+0.0%

ININ.OL

Inin Group AS

Technology / Scientific & Technical InstrumentsOslo

$3.10

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $3.10Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 42/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $78.2M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 21/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

42/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · ININ.OLLocal privado en este navegador · Inin Group AS
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$404M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

1962.0%

↑

Gross Margin

25.0%

↓

Debt/Equity

-84.14

↓
52-Week Range$3
$2$4

TradingView lightweight chart

ININ.OL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $3.100Periodo -41.0%
Fair value: $3.100

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+141.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

11.2%

FCF / Net income

-1.19x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $942.6M · net income $-88.7M · FCF $105.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

25.0%+16.0% pts

Operating margin

-1.2%+70.4% pts

Net margin

-9.4%+84.5% pts

FCF margin

11.2%+88.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$942.6M$942.6M$884.2M$682.7M$66.8M
Net Income$-88.7M$-88.7M$-142.8M$-79.8M$-62.7M
EBITDA$-9.8M$-9.8M$24.0M$-31.8M$-32.5M
EPS——-1.06-0.59-0.48
Gross Margin25.0%25.0%21.3%22.9%8.9%
Operating Margin-1.2%-1.2%-12.7%-3.0%-71.6%
Net Margin-9.4%-9.4%-16.2%-11.7%-93.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-84.14-84.145.830.720.11
Current Ratio0.860.86———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$105.9M$105.9M$78.2M$72.1M$-51.7M
Returns
ROE1962.0%1962.0%-193.4%-38.6%-23.8%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA——26.87——
P/B——4.272.191.14
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth6.6%6.6%29.5%921.3%—
EPS Growth——-79.7%-22.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +27.6%

Total return

+27.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-1.06 → n/d

Residual

+27.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+27.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.