StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
IOV.AX$0.47+15.85%
Fair $0.47+0.0%

IOV.AX

Ion Video Ltd

Technology / Software - ApplicationASX

$0.47

+0.06 (+15.85%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.47Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 43/C
F-Score: 2/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-3.7M · quality 50.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 30/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

43/100

C

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · IOV.AXLocal privado en este navegador · Ion Video Ltd
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$48M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

2303.1%

↑

Gross Margin

100.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

IOV.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.475Periodo -97.1%
Fair value: $0.475

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+95.7%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-458.5%

FCF / Net income

0.78x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $811120.0 · net income $-4.8M · FCF $-3.7M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

100.0%+0.0% pts

Operating margin

-621.7%+5042.7% pts

Net margin

-591.0%+5072.5% pts

FCF margin

-458.5%+4057.3% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$811120.00$811120.00$228906.00$250749.00$108193.00
Net Income$-4.8M$-4.8M$-5.2M$-9.0M$-6.1M
EBITDA$-4.2M$-4.2M$-4.2M$-8.3M$-5.6M
EPS-0.12-0.12-0.19-0.52—
Gross Margin100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%
Operating Margin-621.7%-621.7%-2220.5%-3718.4%-5664.3%
Net Margin-591.0%-591.0%-2287.9%-3588.9%-5663.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity———1.77—
Current Ratio3.463.46———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.7M$-3.7M$-3.6M$-7.9M$-4.9M
Returns
ROE2303.1%2303.1%-668.1%-1221.7%-177.6%
Valuation
P/B——10.7514.10—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth254.3%254.3%-8.7%131.8%—
EPS Growth36.8%36.8%63.5%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +375.0%

Total return

+375.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.19 → -0.12

Residual

+375.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+375.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.