StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ITS.SI$0.94+1.63%
Fair $0.94+0.0%

ITS.SI

ITS.SI

Technology / Software - ApplicationSES

$0.94

+0.01 (+1.63%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.94Fund rank 40/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 48/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 22% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $15.7M · quality 84.7/100

Data gap 40/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 92/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

48/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · ITS.SILocal privado en este navegador · ITS.SI
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$241M

P/E

15.6x

↓

EV/EBITDA

8.3x

↓

ROE

37.7%

↑

Gross Margin

85.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.10

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$1

TradingView lightweight chart

ITS.SI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.935Periodo +2.7%
Fair value: $0.935

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+22.3%

FCF CAGR

+16.4%

FCF margin

27.7%

FCF / Net income

1.04x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $56.5M · net income $15.0M · FCF $15.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

85.2%-0.8% pts

Operating margin

33.5%+2.7% pts

Net margin

26.6%+3.3% pts

FCF margin

27.7%-4.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$56.5M$56.5M$43.7M$38.1M$30.8M
Net Income$15.0M$15.0M$12.3M$10.5M$7.2M
EBITDA$21.5M$21.5M$17.2M$15.0M$10.6M
EPS——0.050.040.03
Gross Margin85.2%85.2%85.6%87.0%86.0%
Operating Margin33.5%33.5%34.1%34.8%30.8%
Net Margin26.6%26.6%28.2%27.6%23.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.100.100.890.633.55
Current Ratio1.991.99———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$15.7M$15.7M$17.6M$13.2M$9.9M
Returns
ROE37.7%37.7%309.9%240.8%895.9%
Valuation
P/E15.5815.58———
EV/EBITDA8.298.29———
P/B6.056.05———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth29.2%29.2%14.8%23.4%—
EPS Growth——17.7%46.0%—
Dividend Yield3.8%3.8%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +6.5%

Total return

+6.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.05 → n/d

Residual

+2.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.8%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+2.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.