StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
IZINV.IS$68.20+0.59%
Fair $68.20+0.0%

IZINV.IS

Iz Yatirim Holding A.S.

Industrials / ConglomeratesIstanbul

$68.20

+0.40 (+0.59%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $68.20Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 28/D
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 16%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $3.3M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 13/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

28/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists. ROE is -2.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · IZINV.ISLocal privado en este navegador · Iz Yatirim Holding A.S.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.2B

P/E

133.7x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-2.9%

↓

Gross Margin

-5.6%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.04

↓
52-Week Range$68
$41$93

TradingView lightweight chart

IZINV.IS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $68.20Periodo +3931.7%
Fair value: $68.20

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2023 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-13.7%

FCF CAGR

+305.9%

FCF margin

336.5%

FCF / Net income

-10.75x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $15.9M · net income $-5.0M · FCF $53.6M

2021-FY → 2023-FY

Gross margin

-5.6%-4.3% pts

Operating margin

-64.4%-53.8% pts

Net margin

-31.3%-7.0% pts

FCF margin

336.5%+321.3% pts
MetricTTM
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$15.9M$15.9M$55.8M$21.4M
Net Income$-5.0M$-5.0M$-8.2M$-5.2M
EBITDA$-3.7M$-3.7M$4.7M$-1.4M
EPS-0.32-0.32-0.52-0.35
Gross Margin-5.6%-5.6%-14.0%-1.3%
Operating Margin-64.4%-64.4%-24.2%-10.6%
Net Margin-31.3%-31.3%-14.6%-24.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.040.040.020.64
Current Ratio2.692.69——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$53.6M$53.6M$-1.9M$3.3M
Returns
ROE-2.9%-2.9%-4.4%-21.0%
Valuation
P/E133.73133.73——
EV/EBITDA——73.37—
P/B6.266.261.8511.38
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-71.4%-71.4%160.9%—
EPS Growth38.8%38.8%-49.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +62.4%

Total return

+62.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.52 → -0.32

Residual

+62.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+62.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.