StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
J03.SI$0.03+0.00%
Fair $0.03+0.0%

J03.SI

Jadason Enterprises Ltd

Technology / Electronic ComponentsSES

$0.03

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.03Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 50/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-2.5M · quality 56.0/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 25/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

50/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · J03.SILocal privado en este navegador · Jadason Enterprises Ltd
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$32M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

8.1x

↓

ROE

29.9%

↑

Gross Margin

11.2%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.09

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

J03.SI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.030Periodo -89.8%
Fair value: $0.030

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-3.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-8.6%

FCF / Net income

-1.76x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $29.1M · net income $1.4M · FCF $-2.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

11.2%+8.4% pts

Operating margin

-4.5%+17.0% pts

Net margin

4.9%+26.5% pts

FCF margin

-8.6%-6.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$29.1M$29.1M$25.3M$21.9M$32.2M
Net Income$1.4M$1.4M$-1.1M$-8.0M$-6.9M
EBITDA$2.1M$2.1M$-504000.00$-6.5M$-3.7M
EPS——-0.00-0.01-0.01
Gross Margin11.2%11.2%11.4%3.5%2.7%
Operating Margin-4.5%-4.5%-3.7%-27.1%-21.5%
Net Margin4.9%4.9%-4.4%-36.4%-21.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.090.090.280.720.48
Current Ratio1.331.33———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.5M$-2.5M$-2.5M$-66000.00$-746000.00
Returns
ROE29.9%29.9%-29.1%-183.6%-55.0%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA8.108.10———
P/B4.564.562.290.831.09
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth14.9%14.9%15.4%-31.8%—
EPS Growth——86.4%-14.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +233.3%

Total return

+233.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.00 → n/d

Residual

+233.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+233.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.