StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
JUNS$0.27+1.45%
Fair $0.27+0.0%

JUNS

Jupiter Neurosciences, Inc.

Healthcare / BiotechnologyNasdaqCM

$0.27

+0.00 (+1.45%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.27Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 17/F
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-3.9M · quality 65.7/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 30/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

17/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists. ROE is 4.7%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · JUNSLocal privado en este navegador · Jupiter Neurosciences, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$12M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

471.9%

↑

Gross Margin

80.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

-2.90

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$3

TradingView lightweight chart

JUNS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.266Periodo -95.2%
Fair value: $0.266

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-54.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-24838.2%

FCF / Net income

0.63x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $21796.0 · net income $-8.6M · FCF $-5.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

80.6%— pts

Operating margin

-40873.2%-39401.8% pts

Net margin

-39662.8%-37537.6% pts

FCF margin

-24838.2%-24303.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$21796.00$21796.00——$233281.00
Net Income$-8.6M$-8.6M$-2.4M$-4.8M$-5.0M
EBITDA$-8.6M$-8.6M$-2.2M$-4.6M$-4.2M
EPS——-0.08-0.18-0.15
Gross Margin80.6%80.6%———
Operating Margin-40873.2%-40873.2%——-1471.4%
Net Margin-39662.8%-39662.8%——-2125.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-2.90-2.900.05-0.39-0.27
Current Ratio0.650.65———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-5.4M$-5.4M$-3.9M$-480953.00$-1.2M
Returns
ROE471.9%471.9%-58.5%82.5%69.4%
Valuation
P/B——58.64——
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth——55.6%-19.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -67.5%

Total return

-67.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.08 → n/d

Residual

-67.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-67.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.