StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
JWEL$2.40+6.67%
Fair $2.40+0.0%

JWEL

Jowell Global Ltd.

Consumer Cyclical / Internet RetailNasdaqCM

$2.40

+0.15 (+6.67%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2.40Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 24/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.5M · quality 55.3/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 25/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

24/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -54.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · JWELLocal privado en este navegador · Jowell Global Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$6M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-54.8%

↓

Gross Margin

7.0%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.13

↓
52-Week Range$2
$1$3

TradingView lightweight chart

JWEL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2.400Periodo -98.3%
Fair value: $2.400

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-7.7%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-0.9%

FCF / Net income

0.25x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $165.0M · net income $-6.3M · FCF $-1.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

7.0%+4.0% pts

Operating margin

-3.0%+2.7% pts

Net margin

-3.8%+1.7% pts

FCF margin

-0.9%+5.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$165.0M$165.0M$133.0M$160.0M$210.0M
Net Income$-6.3M$-6.3M$-8.0M$-11.5M$-11.5M
EBITDA$-4.9M$-4.9M$-6.0M$-9.5M$-9.9M
EPS——-3.67-5.36-6.25
Gross Margin7.0%7.0%1.0%2.0%3.0%
Operating Margin-3.0%-3.0%-6.1%-6.8%-5.7%
Net Margin-3.8%-3.8%-6.0%-7.2%-5.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.130.130.130.100.15
Current Ratio1.681.68———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.5M$-1.5M$666223.00$-13.5M$-13.3M
Returns
ROE-54.8%-54.8%-47.1%-45.5%-30.8%
Valuation
P/B——0.380.170.36
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth24.1%24.1%-16.9%-23.8%—
EPS Growth——31.5%14.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +21.5%

Total return

+21.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-3.67 → n/d

Residual

+21.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+21.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.