StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
JWL.NS$276.40+0.80%
Fair $276.40+0.0%

JWL.NS

Jupiter Wagons Limited

Industrials / RailroadsNSE

$276.40

+2.20 (+0.80%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $276.40Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 30/D
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-4.0B · quality 47.0/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 14/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

30/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · JWL.NSLocal privado en este navegador · Jupiter Wagons Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$118.1B

P/E

68.6x

↑

EV/EBITDA

33.0x

↑

ROE

5.7%

↓

Gross Margin

22.6%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.33

↑
52-Week Range$276
$236$419

TradingView lightweight chart

JWL.NS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $276.40Periodo +144.8%
Fair value: $276.40

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+12.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-18.0%

FCF / Net income

-3.07x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $29.16B · net income $1.71B · FCF $-5.25B

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

22.6%+8.9% pts

Operating margin

10.1%-0.9% pts

Net margin

5.9%-0.0% pts

FCF margin

-18.0%-18.3% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$29.16B$29.16B$39.63B$36.24B$20.51B
Net Income$1.71B$1.71B$3.82B$3.32B$1.21B
EBITDA$3.82B$3.82B$6.10B$5.11B$2.48B
EPS——9.088.243.12
Gross Margin22.6%22.6%21.6%20.3%13.7%
Operating Margin10.1%10.1%13.2%12.7%11.1%
Net Margin5.9%5.9%9.6%9.1%5.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.330.330.180.220.36
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-5.25B$-5.25B$-4.04B$-1.44B$49.6M
Returns
ROE5.7%5.7%13.9%20.5%15.0%
Valuation
P/E68.5968.5940.6247.1633.06
EV/EBITDA33.0033.0025.5531.7916.78
P/B3.973.975.649.914.97
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-26.4%-26.4%9.4%76.7%—
EPS Growth——10.2%164.1%—
Dividend Yield0.7%0.7%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -31.2%

Total return

-31.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

9.08 → n/d

Residual

-31.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.7%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-31.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.