StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
KCR.L$8.10+0.00%
Fair $8.10+0.0%

KCR.L

KCR Residential REIT

Unknown / UnknownLSE

$8.10

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $8.10Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 3/F
F-Score: 1/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-876138.00 · quality 70.0/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 46/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

3/100

F

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific NAV/AFFO model required: REIT/real-estate targets are disabled until FFO/AFFO/NAV/cap-rate data exists. REIT NAV/AFFO valuation requires positive AFFO/share history or TTM AFFO/share; generic FCF remains disabled. ROE is -9.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · KCR.LLocal privado en este navegador · KCR Residential REIT
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$3M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-9.6%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

1.13

↑
52-Week Range$8
$0$14

TradingView lightweight chart

KCR.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $8.100Periodo -92.0%
Fair value: $8.100

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-19.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-126.5%

FCF / Net income

0.59x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $553575.0 · net income $-1.2M · FCF $-700312.0

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

-214.3%-125.7% pts

FCF margin

-126.5%-0.0% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$553575.00$553575.00$1.9M$1.1M$1.0M
Net Income$-1.2M$-1.2M$-166136.00$-342081.00$-924234.00
EPS-0.03-0.03-0.00-0.01—
Net Margin-214.3%-214.3%-8.9%-30.8%-88.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.131.130.980.971.12
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-700312.00$-700312.00$-1.1M$-876138.00$-1.3M
Returns
ROE-9.6%-9.6%-1.2%-2.5%-8.2%
Valuation
P/B27.3927.3929.3038.2143.55
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-70.3%-70.3%67.8%6.5%—
EPS Growth-612.5%-612.5%52.9%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -22.9%

Total return

-22.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.00 → -0.03

Residual

-22.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-22.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.