StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
KDK$6.92+0.22%
Fair $6.92+0.0%

KDK

Kodiak AI, Inc.

Technology / Software - InfrastructureNasdaqGM

$6.92

+0.01 (+0.22%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $6.92Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 23/D
F-Score: 2/9
Declining RevenueLow Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-54.2M · quality 53.7/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 17/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

23/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 2unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. Revenue has declined for 2 consecutive years ROE is 2.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · KDKLocal privado en este navegador · Kodiak AI, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.4B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

206.9%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

-0.17

↓
52-Week Range$7
$5$11

TradingView lightweight chart

KDK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $6.915Periodo -13.0%
Fair value: $6.915

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-3067.4%

FCF / Net income

0.20x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.8M · net income $-585.5M · FCF $-116.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

-2966.2%— pts

Net margin

-15420.7%— pts

FCF margin

-3067.4%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$3.8M$3.8M$14.9M$16.9M—
Net Income$-585.5M$-585.5M$-69.5M$-56.9M$-3542.00
EBITDA$-576.9M$-576.9M$-59.9M$-47.4M—
EPS——-0.40-0.33—
Operating Margin-2966.2%-2966.2%-413.3%-317.8%—
Net Margin-15420.7%-15420.7%-465.1%-336.0%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-0.17-0.17-0.17-0.230.00
Current Ratio3.693.69———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-116.5M$-116.5M$-54.2M$-47.1M—
Returns
ROE206.9%206.9%27.7%30.4%0.0%
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-74.6%-74.6%-11.9%——
EPS Growth——-22.0%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -13.0%

Total return

-13.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.40 → n/d

Residual

-13.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-13.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.