StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
KDOZ.V$0.23+0.00%
Fair $0.23+0.0%

KDOZ.V

Kidoz Inc.

Communication Services / Advertising AgenciesTSXV

$0.23

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.23Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 25/D
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $1.3M · quality 39.3/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 34/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

25/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · KDOZ.VLocal privado en este navegador · Kidoz Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$30M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

42.3x

↑

ROE

5.3%

↑

Gross Margin

48.4%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

KDOZ.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.230Periodo -37.8%
Fair value: $0.230

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+6.9%

FCF CAGR

+59.9%

FCF margin

9.1%

FCF / Net income

3.68x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $18.4M · net income $456817.0 · FCF $1.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

48.4%+14.4% pts

Operating margin

2.3%+11.4% pts

Net margin

2.5%+11.4% pts

FCF margin

9.1%+6.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$18.4M$18.4M$14.0M$13.3M$15.1M
Net Income$456817.00$456817.00$353140.00$-2.0M$-1.3M
EBITDA$608562.00$608562.00$852665.00$-1.5M$-792042.00
EPS———-0.02-0.01
Gross Margin48.4%48.4%54.1%37.0%33.9%
Operating Margin2.3%2.3%4.3%-15.4%-9.1%
Net Margin2.5%2.5%2.5%-15.1%-8.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity———0.000.01
Current Ratio2.512.51———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$1.7M$1.7M$1.3M$-832354.00$410939.00
Returns
ROE5.3%5.3%4.5%-28.0%-15.5%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA42.3142.3118.30——
P/B3.503.502.323.194.84
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth31.6%31.6%5.1%-11.7%—
EPS Growth———-100.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -20.7%

Total return

-20.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → n/d

Residual

-20.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-20.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.