Industrials / Staffing & Employment ServicesNasdaqGS
$21.00
+0.12 (+0.57%)
FCF base 3Y
n/d
n/d CAGR · yield n/d
FCF base 5Y
n/d
n/d base · n/d expected
Precio de entrada
n/d
MOS 33% · confianza 25%
FCF escenarios
weak_data · normalized FCF $61.4M · quality 49.3/100
Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.
SA Score
43/100
C
Piotroski
4/9
balance/quality
Valuation
50/100
+0.0% upside
5Y CAGR
+0.0%
50/100
Data QA
20/100
SEC 0%
Sin guardar todavía.
Market Cap
$728M
P/E
N/A
•EV/EBITDA
N/A
•ROE
-26.0%
↓Gross Margin
20.1%
↓Debt/Equity
0.16
↓TradingView lightweight chart
Absolute Values (Left Axis)
Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)
Financial statement dashboard
2010–2025 · 15 años de histórico normalizado
Revenue CAGR
—
FCF CAGR
—
FCF margin
2.7%
FCF / Net income
-0.45x
Latest source
Provider fallback
Margin decomposition
Último año: revenue $4.25B · net income $-254.1M · FCF $114.1M
Gross margin
Operating margin
Net margin
FCF margin
| Metric | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Statement | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $4.25B | $4.25B | $4.33B | $4.84B | $4.97B | $4.52B | $5.36B | $5.51B | $5.37B | — | — | $5.41B | $5.45B | — | — |
| Net Income | $-254.1M | $-254.1M | $-600000.00 | $36.4M | $-62.5M | $-72.0M | $112.4M | $22.9M | $71.6M | $53.8M | $23.7M | $58.9M | $50.1M | $26.1M | $-104.5M |
| EBITDA | $-13.1M | $-13.1M | $39.9M | $78.2M | $-17.2M | $-69.4M | $113.4M | $113.6M | $106.0M | $89.0M | $43.6M | $73.7M | $94.6M | $3.2M | $-105.2M |
| EPS | -7.24 | -7.24 | -0.02 | 0.98 | -1.64 | -1.83 | 2.84 | 0.58 | 1.81 | 1.39 | 0.61 | 1.54 | 1.32 | 0.71 | -3.00 |
| Gross Margin | 20.1% | 20.1% | 20.4% | 19.9% | 20.4% | 18.3% | 18.1% | 17.6% | 17.8% | — | — | 16.4% | 16.4% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 0.6% | 0.6% | 1.5% | 0.6% | 1.4% | -2.1% | 1.5% | 1.6% | 1.5% | — | — | 1.0% | 1.3% | — | — |
| Net Margin | -6.0% | -6.0% | -0.0% | 0.8% | -1.3% | -1.6% | 2.1% | 0.4% | 1.3% | — | — | 1.1% | 0.9% | — | — |
| Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||||
| Debt/Equity | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.25 | 0.04 | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Current Ratio | 1.59 | 1.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Cash Flow | |||||||||||||||
| Free Cash Flow | $114.1M | $114.1M | $15.8M | $61.4M | $-88.3M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Returns | |||||||||||||||
| ROE | -26.0% | -26.0% | -0.0% | 2.9% | -5.0% | -6.0% | 8.9% | 2.0% | 6.2% | 6.0% | 2.8% | 7.2% | 6.8% | 4.2% | -18.4% |
| Valuation | |||||||||||||||
| P/E | — | — | — | 22.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV/EBITDA | — | — | 18.70 | 9.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.39 | 0.63 | 0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Growth & Yield | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue Growth | -1.9% | -1.9% | -10.4% | -2.6% | — | -15.7% | -2.9% | 2.6% | — | — | — | -0.7% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth | -36100.0% | -36100.0% | -102.0% | 159.8% | — | -164.4% | 389.7% | -68.0% | 30.2% | 127.9% | -60.4% | 16.7% | 85.9% | 123.7% | — |
| Dividend Yield | 1.4% | 1.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)
Margins (%)
Returns (%)
Leverage & Liquidity
Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.
Total return
+84.8%
Start / end P/E
n/dx → n/dx
EPS bridge
-0.02 → -7.24
Residual
+83.4%
EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.
Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.