StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
KIN.SI$0.23+0.00%
Fair $0.23+0.0%

KIN.SI

KIN.SI

Industrials / Specialty Business ServicesSES

$0.23

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.23Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 50/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-109000.00 · quality 49.7/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 21/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

50/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · KIN.SILocal privado en este navegador · KIN.SI
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$45M

P/E

11.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

8.1x

↓

ROE

50.6%

↑

Gross Margin

17.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.07

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

KIN.SI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.230Periodo -13.2%
Fair value: $0.230

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+86.5%

FCF CAGR

+39.0%

FCF margin

7.6%

FCF / Net income

1.23x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $60.1M · net income $3.7M · FCF $4.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

17.1%-14.7% pts

Operating margin

8.0%-5.0% pts

Net margin

6.1%-3.1% pts

FCF margin

7.6%-10.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$60.1M$60.1M$19.6M$20.6M$9.3M
Net Income$3.7M$3.7M$1.6M$864000.00$852000.00
EBITDA$5.2M$5.2M$2.2M$1.5M$1.3M
EPS——0.010.000.00
Gross Margin17.1%17.1%25.6%19.2%31.8%
Operating Margin8.0%8.0%7.9%5.0%13.0%
Net Margin6.1%6.1%8.2%4.2%9.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.070.070.350.120.22
Current Ratio2.152.15———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$4.5M$4.5M$-1.2M$-109000.00$1.7M
Returns
ROE50.6%50.6%28.8%17.7%19.8%
Valuation
P/E11.5011.50———
EV/EBITDA8.098.09———
P/B6.166.16———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth207.0%207.0%-5.0%122.5%—
EPS Growth——86.9%1.4%—
Dividend Yield1.7%1.7%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -11.6%

Total return

-11.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.01 → n/d

Residual

-13.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+1.7%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-13.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.