StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
KING.JK$460.00-9.80%
Fair $460.00+0.0%

KING.JK

PT Hoffmen Cleanindo Tbk

Industrials / Specialty Business ServicesJakartaID

$460.00

-50.00 (-9.80%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $460.00Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 40/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $9.1B · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 7/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

40/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: eodhdPeriods: 4Warnings: 0eodhd: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · KING.JKLocal privado en este navegador · PT Hoffmen Cleanindo Tbk
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.20T

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

8.1%

↑

Gross Margin

25.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$460
$188$565

TradingView lightweight chart

KING.JK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $460.00Periodo +293.2%
Fair value: $460.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-8.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

11.1%

FCF / Net income

2.41x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $122.38B · net income $5.61B · FCF $13.54B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

25.6%+12.1% pts

Operating margin

5.7%+2.9% pts

Net margin

4.6%+3.9% pts

FCF margin

11.1%+13.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$122.38B$122.38B$215.12B$213.11B$161.86B
Net Income$5.61B$5.61B$11.60B$2.54B$1.06B
EPS2.162.164.460.980.27
Gross Margin25.6%25.6%16.4%13.1%13.5%
Operating Margin5.7%5.7%7.1%2.2%2.8%
Net Margin4.6%4.6%5.4%1.2%0.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.020.020.000.06
Current Ratio0.630.632.842.631.37
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$13.54B$13.54B$9.07B$-6.90B$-3.65B
Returns
ROE8.1%8.1%11.0%2.7%3.8%
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-43.1%-43.1%0.9%31.7%—
EPS Growth-51.7%-51.7%356.6%267.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

166.5%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$40.82

Spread vs growth

-218.2%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

87.1%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$49.39

Spread vs growth

-138.7%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

43.4%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$79.54

Spread vs growth

-95.1%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +123.3%

Total return

+123.3%

Start / end P/E

46.2x → 213.3x

EPS bridge

4.46 → 2.16

Residual

-187.0%

EPS growth-51.7%
Multiple rerating+362.0%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-187.0%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.