StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
KLAS.JK$68.00+3.03%
Fair $68.00+0.0%

KLAS.JK

PT Pelayaran Kurnia Lautan Semesta Tbk

Industrials / Marine ShippingJakartaID

$68.00

+2.00 (+3.03%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $68.00Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 34/D
F-Score: 8/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $2.1B · quality 45.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 21/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

34/100

D

Piotroski

8/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: eodhdPeriods: 4Warnings: 0eodhd: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · KLAS.JKLocal privado en este navegador · PT Pelayaran Kurnia Lautan Semesta Tbk
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$247.8B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

13.2%

↑

Gross Margin

33.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.50

↑
52-Week Range$68
$51$187

TradingView lightweight chart

KLAS.JK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $68.00Periodo -40.2%
Fair value: $68.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+6.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-47.8%

FCF / Net income

-3.18x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $231.16B · net income $34.71B · FCF $-110.45B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

33.6%-3.4% pts

Operating margin

21.0%-3.5% pts

Net margin

15.0%-2.7% pts

FCF margin

-47.8%-65.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$231.16B$231.16B$187.79B$153.39B$194.28B
Net Income$34.71B$34.71B$23.83B$25.37B$34.51B
EPS9.529.526.546.969.47
Gross Margin33.6%33.6%33.4%38.4%37.0%
Operating Margin21.0%21.0%18.3%24.0%24.5%
Net Margin15.0%15.0%12.7%16.5%17.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.500.500.220.270.52
Current Ratio2.122.121.541.781.42
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-110.45B$-110.45B$2.11B$21.51B$33.37B
Returns
ROE13.2%13.2%10.3%12.0%30.6%
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth23.1%23.1%22.4%-21.0%—
EPS Growth45.6%45.6%-6.1%-26.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-14.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$6.03

Spread vs growth

59.8%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-5.2%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$7.30

Spread vs growth

50.8%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

2.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$11.76

Spread vs growth

43.5%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -48.5%

Total return

-48.5%

Start / end P/E

20.2x → 7.1x

EPS bridge

6.54 → 9.52

Residual

-29.5%

EPS growth+45.6%
Multiple rerating-64.6%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-29.5%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.