StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
KLRS$4.90-7.02%
Fair $4.90+0.0%

KLRS

Kalaris Therapeutics, Inc.

Healthcare / BiotechnologyNasdaqGM

$4.90

-0.37 (-7.02%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $4.90Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 26/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-20.7M · quality 67.0/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 39/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

26/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 7Warnings: 1unknown: 7
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists. ROE is -55.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · KLRSLocal privado en este navegador · Kalaris Therapeutics, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$117M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-55.1%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$5
$2$12

TradingView lightweight chart

KLRS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $4.900Periodo -99.2%
Fair value: $4.900

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2019–2025 · 6 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

0.89x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $-43.4M · FCF $-38.6M

2019-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
Income Statement
Revenue———————$165000.00
Net Income$-43.4M$-43.4M$-69.2M$-14.7M$-15.5M$-172.0M$-69.8M$-23.8M
EBITDA$-42.0M$-42.0M$-66.5M$-14.0M$-15.3M$-169.6M$-71.2M$-26.7M
EPS-2.85-2.85-3.70-11.05-11.64-63.02——
Operating Margin———————-16182.4%
Net Margin———————-14447.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.02-0.20—-0.11———
Current Ratio12.1912.19——————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-38.6M$-38.6M$-20.7M$-14.1M$-9.8M$-106.3M$-61.0M$-20.5M
Returns
ROE-55.1%-55.1%71.6%32.7%51.2%-76.3%-19.8%46.3%
Valuation
P/B0.950.95——————
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth23.1%23.1%66.5%5.1%————

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +69.0%

Total return

+69.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-3.70 → -2.85

Residual

+69.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+69.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.