StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
KUH.SI$0.13+0.00%
Fair $0.13+0.0%

KUH.SI

TSH Corporation Limited

Consumer Cyclical / RestaurantsSES

$0.13

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.13Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 61/B
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $2.8M · quality 63.0/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 54/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

61/100

B

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · KUH.SILocal privado en este navegador · TSH Corporation Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$6M

P/E

4.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

2.0x

↓

ROE

12.0%

↑

Gross Margin

73.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.30

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

KUH.SI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.130Periodo -97.5%
Fair value: $0.130

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+12.3%

FCF CAGR

+129.6%

FCF margin

25.2%

FCF / Net income

2.52x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $12.6M · net income $1.3M · FCF $3.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

73.6%-2.1% pts

Operating margin

11.9%+0.1% pts

Net margin

10.0%+0.4% pts

FCF margin

25.2%+22.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$12.6M$12.6M$11.8M$10.9M$8.9M
Net Income$1.3M$1.3M$853609.00$392000.00$851895.00
EBITDA$2.7M$2.7M$2.5M$1.9M$1.6M
EPS——0.020.010.02
Gross Margin73.6%73.6%74.4%74.5%75.6%
Operating Margin11.9%11.9%10.5%7.6%11.8%
Net Margin10.0%10.0%7.3%3.6%9.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.300.300.350.630.65
Current Ratio3.633.63———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$3.2M$3.2M$2.8M$120000.00$262881.00
Returns
ROE12.0%12.0%9.9%5.1%11.6%
Valuation
P/E4.334.336.2524.436.82
EV/EBITDA2.032.032.356.754.28
P/B0.550.550.621.230.79
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth7.4%7.4%7.4%22.8%—
EPS Growth——118.2%-54.2%—
Dividend Yield3.9%3.9%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +113.5%

Total return

+113.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.02 → n/d

Residual

+109.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.9%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+109.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.