StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
LASTIK.HE$6.82-0.29%
Fair $6.82+0.0%

LASTIK.HE

Lassila & Tikanoja Plc

Industrials / Waste ManagementHelsinki

$6.82

-0.02 (-0.29%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $6.82Fund rank 39/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 37/D
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 23% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $39.1M · quality 85.7/100

Data gap 39/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 85/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

37/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · LASTIK.HELocal privado en este navegador · Lassila & Tikanoja Plc
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$260M

P/E

10.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

3.8x

↓

ROE

10.7%

↑

Gross Margin

70.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.23

↓
52-Week Range$7
$7$8

TradingView lightweight chart

LASTIK.HE price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $6.890Periodo -16.0%
Fair value: $6.820

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2024 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-3.0%

FCF CAGR

-11.7%

FCF margin

7.7%

FCF / Net income

1.22x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $423.9M · net income $26.9M · FCF $32.8M

2022-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

70.8%+7.3% pts

Operating margin

8.6%-0.4% pts

Net margin

6.3%-1.5% pts

FCF margin

7.7%-1.6% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$423.9M$423.9M$422.0M$450.9M
Net Income$26.9M$26.9M$32.4M$35.5M
EBITDA$84.2M$84.2M$83.9M$84.5M
EPS0.700.700.850.93
Gross Margin70.8%70.8%69.8%63.5%
Operating Margin8.6%8.6%9.5%9.0%
Net Margin6.3%6.3%7.7%7.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.230.230.250.22
Current Ratio0.900.90——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$32.8M$32.8M$39.1M$42.1M
Returns
ROE10.7%10.7%12.9%13.8%
Valuation
P/E10.4910.49——
EV/EBITDA3.763.76——
P/B1.031.03——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth0.5%0.5%-6.4%—
EPS Growth-17.0%-17.0%-8.7%—
Dividend Yield6.1%6.1%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-4.9%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.61

Spread vs growth

-12.1%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

0.8%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.73

Spread vs growth

-17.8%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

5.3%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$1.18

Spread vs growth

-22.3%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -9.9%

Total return

-9.9%

Start / end P/E

9.7x → 9.8x

EPS bridge

0.85 → 0.70

Residual

-0.2%

EPS growth-17.0%
Multiple rerating+1.2%
Dividend+6.1%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-0.2%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.