StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
LMRI$7.35-5.53%
Fair $7.35+0.0%

LMRI

Lumexa Imaging Holdings, Inc.

Healthcare / Medical DevicesNasdaqGS

$7.35

-0.43 (-5.53%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $7.35Fund rank 22/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 13/F
F-Score: 7/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $13.0M · quality 26.3/100

Data gap 22/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 24/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

13/100

F

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists. ROE is -8.0%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · LMRILocal privado en este navegador · Lumexa Imaging Holdings, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$706M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

10.1x

↓

ROE

-8.0%

↓

Gross Margin

15.4%

↓

Debt/Equity

1.64

↑
52-Week Range$7
$6$19

TradingView lightweight chart

LMRI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $7.350Periodo -60.3%
Fair value: $7.350

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+4.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-0.6%

FCF / Net income

0.14x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.02B · net income $-47.1M · FCF $-6.4M

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

15.4%+4.8% pts

Operating margin

2.6%+4.0% pts

Net margin

-4.6%+8.5% pts

FCF margin

-0.6%-2.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$1.02B$1.02B$948.9M$935.9M
Net Income$-47.1M$-47.1M$-94.1M$-122.2M
EBITDA$141.7M$141.7M$114.0M$94.5M
EPS-0.66-0.66-1.35-1.76
Gross Margin15.4%15.4%10.1%10.6%
Operating Margin2.6%2.6%-1.7%-1.4%
Net Margin-4.6%-4.6%-9.9%-13.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.641.648.106.58
Current Ratio1.411.41——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-6.4M$-6.4M$13.0M$13.5M
Returns
ROE-8.0%-8.0%-58.2%-61.6%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA10.0610.06——
P/B0.890.89——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth7.8%7.8%1.4%—
EPS Growth51.1%51.1%23.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -60.3%

Total return

-60.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-1.35 → -0.66

Residual

-60.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-60.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.