StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
LNKS$1.53-1.29%
Fair $1.53+0.0%

LNKS

Linkers Industries Limited

Industrials / Electrical Equipment & PartsNasdaqCM

$1.53

-0.02 (-1.29%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.53Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 17/F
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $863989.00 · quality 39.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 15/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

17/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -11.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · LNKSLocal privado en este navegador · Linkers Industries Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-11.6%

↓

Gross Margin

10.0%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.34

↑
52-Week Range$2
$1$420

TradingView lightweight chart

LNKS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.530Periodo -99.9%
Fair value: $1.530

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2024 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-16.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

3.9%

FCF / Net income

-0.43x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $22.4M · net income $-2.0M · FCF $863989.0

2022-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

10.0%-6.0% pts

Operating margin

-6.8%-9.5% pts

Net margin

-8.9%-10.6% pts

FCF margin

3.9%+11.3% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$22.4M$22.4M$34.3M$32.5M
Net Income$-2.0M$-2.0M$184519.00$563060.00
EBITDA$-164022.00$-164022.00$2.2M$2.1M
EPS-38.01-38.013.4310.70
Gross Margin10.0%10.0%13.3%15.9%
Operating Margin-6.8%-6.8%0.8%2.8%
Net Margin-8.9%-8.9%0.5%1.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.340.340.550.50
Current Ratio4.684.68——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$863989.00$863989.00$1.6M$-2.4M
Returns
ROE-11.6%-11.6%1.0%3.0%
Valuation
P/B0.000.00——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-34.6%-34.6%5.6%—
EPS Growth-1208.3%-1208.3%-68.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -99.0%

Total return

-99.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

3.43 → -38.01

Residual

-99.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-99.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.