StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
LPS.V$0.13+0.00%
Fair $0.13+0.0%

LPS.V

Legend Power Systems Inc.

Industrials / Electrical Equipment & PartsTSXV

$0.13

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.13Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 39/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-2.1M · quality 71.3/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 36/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

39/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · LPS.VLocal privado en este navegador · Legend Power Systems Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$20M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

2019.0%

↑

Gross Margin

23.4%

↓

Debt/Equity

-1.30

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

LPS.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.130Periodo -96.7%
Fair value: $0.130

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-7.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-111.5%

FCF / Net income

0.57x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.7M · net income $-3.3M · FCF $-1.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

23.4%+13.7% pts

Operating margin

-195.5%+52.2% pts

Net margin

-195.9%+56.5% pts

FCF margin

-111.5%+178.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.7M$1.7M$1.9M$1.1M$2.1M
Net Income$-3.3M$-3.3M$-3.3M$-4.2M$-5.3M
EBITDA$-3.1M$-3.1M$-3.1M$-3.9M$-5.1M
EPS-0.02-0.02-0.03-0.03-0.05
Gross Margin23.4%23.4%37.5%17.6%9.6%
Operating Margin-195.5%-195.5%-174.4%-382.5%-247.7%
Net Margin-195.9%-195.9%-176.4%-378.1%-252.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-1.30-1.300.340.110.04
Current Ratio1.221.22———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.9M$-1.9M$-2.1M$-2.9M$-6.1M
Returns
ROE2019.0%2019.0%-343.9%-104.7%-99.9%
Valuation
P/B——41.146.263.95
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-10.3%-10.3%69.3%-47.8%—
EPS Growth33.3%33.3%5.5%36.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +18.2%

Total return

+18.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.03 → -0.02

Residual

+18.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+18.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.