StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
LRQ.WA$2.12+1.51%
Fair $2.12+0.0%

LRQ.WA

Larq S.A.

Communication Services / Advertising AgenciesWarsaw

$2.12

+0.03 (+1.51%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2.12Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 47/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-385503.48 · quality 45.3/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 8/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

47/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · LRQ.WALocal privado en este navegador · Larq S.A.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$29M

P/E

2.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

2.8x

↓

ROE

18.2%

↑

Gross Margin

95.4%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.20

↓
52-Week Range$2
$2$2

TradingView lightweight chart

LRQ.WA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2.020Periodo -80.4%
Fair value: $2.120

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+12.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-71.1%

FCF / Net income

-0.03x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $441635.1 · net income $11.4M · FCF $-314118.0

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

95.4%+0.5% pts

Operating margin

-116.7%+1214.9% pts

Net margin

2578.9%+4220.5% pts

FCF margin

-71.1%+75.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$441635.09$441635.09$418380.00$380629.86$309652.00
Net Income$11.4M$11.4M$-6.1M$12.7M$-5.1M
EBITDA$14.5M$14.5M$-1.6M$16.7M$-4.9M
EPS——-0.460.97-0.39
Gross Margin95.4%95.4%90.4%95.1%94.9%
Operating Margin-116.7%-116.7%-1020.0%-97.9%-1331.6%
Net Margin2578.9%2578.9%-1451.9%3325.3%-1641.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.200.200.250.100.14
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-314117.95$-314117.95$-6.4M$-385503.48$-455125.86
Returns
ROE18.2%18.2%-11.9%23.4%-12.4%
Valuation
P/E2.492.49—1.47—
EV/EBITDA2.832.83—1.43—
P/B0.460.460.560.340.40
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth5.6%5.6%9.9%22.9%—
EPS Growth——-147.4%348.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +6.6%

Total return

+6.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.46 → n/d

Residual

+6.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+6.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.