StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
LXB.ST$0.18-16.93%
Fair $0.18+0.0%

LXB.ST

Luxbright AB (publ)

Healthcare / Medical DevicesStockholm

$0.18

-0.03 (-16.93%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.18Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 19/F
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-19.9M · quality 53.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 25/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

19/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -72.4%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · LXB.STLocal privado en este navegador · Luxbright AB (publ)
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$24M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-72.4%

↓

Gross Margin

84.9%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.12

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

LXB.ST price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.157Periodo -94.2%
Fair value: $0.178

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-174.1%

FCF / Net income

1.02x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $11.4M · net income $-19.5M · FCF $-19.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

84.9%— pts

Operating margin

-169.1%— pts

Net margin

-170.5%— pts

FCF margin

-174.1%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$11.4M$11.4M$9.0M$854699.00—
Net Income$-19.5M$-19.5M$-17.7M$-25.4M$-21.1M
EBITDA$-16.6M$-16.6M$-15.4M$-23.9M$-20.5M
EPS-0.14-0.14-0.15-0.27-0.45
Gross Margin84.9%84.9%98.4%-327.2%—
Operating Margin-169.1%-169.1%-203.9%-3028.8%—
Net Margin-170.5%-170.5%-196.4%-2968.9%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.120.120.010.010.02
Current Ratio1.381.38———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-19.9M$-19.9M$-16.5M$-20.4M—
Returns
ROE-72.4%-72.4%-51.8%-75.3%-75.8%
Valuation
P/B0.890.892.901.342.64
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth26.5%26.5%955.6%——
EPS Growth4.9%4.9%42.9%41.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -80.1%

Total return

-80.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.15 → -0.14

Residual

-80.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-80.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.