StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
M2A0.F$19.50+0.00%
Fair $19.50+0.0%

M2A0.F

M2A0.F

Industrials / AirlinesFrankfurt

$19.50

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $19.50Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 51/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-62.4M · quality 50.0/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 24/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

51/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · M2A0.FLocal privado en este navegador · M2A0.F
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$913M

P/E

12.8x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.3x

↓

ROE

5.7%

↓

Gross Margin

27.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.92

↑
52-Week Range$20
$13$21

TradingView lightweight chart

M2A0.F price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $19.50Periodo +11.8%
Fair value: $19.50

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+8.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-5.3%

FCF / Net income

-1.16x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.68B · net income $76.2M · FCF $-88.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

27.8%+2.2% pts

Operating margin

12.8%+2.9% pts

Net margin

4.5%-0.6% pts

FCF margin

-5.3%-4.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.68B$1.68B$1.47B$1.43B$1.33B
Net Income$76.2M$76.2M$64.6M$54.8M$67.8M
EBITDA$300.3M$300.3M$261.6M$296.5M$280.5M
EPS1.871.871.621.381.70
Gross Margin27.8%27.8%24.8%22.6%25.6%
Operating Margin12.8%12.8%9.5%9.5%10.0%
Net Margin4.5%4.5%4.4%3.8%5.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.920.921.021.18—
Current Ratio0.940.94———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-88.7M$-88.7M$-33.5M$-62.4M$-9.8M
Returns
ROE5.7%5.7%5.8%5.2%—
Valuation
P/E12.8312.83———
EV/EBITDA6.286.28———
P/B0.600.60———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth13.7%13.7%3.1%7.7%—
EPS Growth15.4%15.4%17.4%-19.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-2.6%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$1.73

Spread vs growth

18.0%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

2.3%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$2.09

Spread vs growth

13.1%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

6.1%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$3.37

Spread vs growth

9.4%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +11.8%

Total return

+11.8%

Start / end P/E

10.8x → 10.4x

EPS bridge

1.62 → 1.87

Residual

-0.5%

EPS growth+15.4%
Multiple rerating-3.1%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-0.5%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.