StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
MAMO$0.97-0.10%
Fair $0.97+0.0%

MAMO

Massimo Group

Consumer Cyclical / Recreational VehiclesNasdaqCM

$0.97

-0.00 (-0.10%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.97Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 30/D
F-Score: 3/9
Declining Revenue

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $6.3M · quality 46.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 21/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

30/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. Revenue has declined for 2 consecutive years
Thesis & Journal · MAMOLocal privado en este navegador · Massimo Group
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$40M

P/E

13.9x

↓

EV/EBITDA

19.5x

↑

ROE

6.4%

↑

Gross Margin

37.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.40

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$6

TradingView lightweight chart

MAMO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.970Periodo -67.8%
Fair value: $0.970

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-6.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-1.2%

FCF / Net income

-0.55x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $71.8M · net income $1.5M · FCF $-829307.0

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

37.5%+11.9% pts

Operating margin

2.8%-2.6% pts

Net margin

2.1%-2.7% pts

FCF margin

-1.2%-1.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$71.8M$71.8M$109.3M$115.0M$86.5M
Net Income$1.5M$1.5M$1.8M$10.4M$4.2M
EBITDA$2.3M$2.3M$2.7M$13.3M$5.2M
EPS——0.040.250.10
Gross Margin37.5%37.5%29.7%31.2%25.7%
Operating Margin2.8%2.8%5.3%11.2%5.3%
Net Margin2.1%2.1%1.6%9.1%4.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.400.400.700.683.56
Current Ratio1.981.98———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-829307.00$-829307.00$6.3M$10.8M$423491.00
Returns
ROE6.4%6.4%8.1%71.9%82.1%
Valuation
P/E13.8613.8664.75——
EV/EBITDA19.4919.4941.53——
P/B1.701.704.91——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-34.3%-34.3%-5.0%32.9%—
EPS Growth——-84.1%142.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -58.4%

Total return

-58.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.04 → n/d

Residual

-58.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-58.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.