StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
MATR.TO$13.10+2.18%
Fair $13.10+0.0%

MATR.TO

Mattr Corp.

Energy / Oil & Gas Equipment & ServicesToronto

$13.10

+0.28 (+2.18%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $13.10Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 46/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $41.1M · quality 41.3/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 29/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

46/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · MATR.TOLocal privado en este navegador · Mattr Corp.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$804M

P/E

100.8x

↑

EV/EBITDA

10.1x

↑

ROE

6.2%

↑

Gross Margin

25.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.75

↑
52-Week Range$13
$7$13

TradingView lightweight chart

MATR.TO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $13.10Periodo +3.1%
Fair value: $13.10

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+13.8%

FCF CAGR

-40.0%

FCF margin

3.2%

FCF / Net income

0.88x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.27B · net income $46.5M · FCF $41.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

25.1%-4.9% pts

Operating margin

5.7%-3.5% pts

Net margin

3.7%+7.1% pts

FCF margin

3.2%-18.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.27B$1.27B$885.3M$880.5M$861.8M
Net Income$46.5M$46.5M$-3.7M$87.2M$-30.0M
EBITDA$128.7M$128.7M$85.1M$106.2M$147.8M
EPS——-0.061.25-0.43
Gross Margin25.1%25.1%27.5%31.6%30.0%
Operating Margin5.7%5.7%6.7%11.2%9.2%
Net Margin3.7%3.7%-0.4%9.9%-3.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.750.750.890.320.39
Current Ratio1.741.74———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$41.1M$41.1M$-59.1M$53.6M$190.4M
Returns
ROE6.2%6.2%-0.5%11.9%-4.3%
Valuation
P/E100.77100.77—11.76—
EV/EBITDA10.1310.1313.048.706.59
P/B1.061.061.171.401.38
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth43.3%43.3%0.5%2.2%—
EPS Growth——-104.8%390.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +38.8%

Total return

+38.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.06 → n/d

Residual

+38.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+38.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.