StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
MAY.AX$0.01-7.69%
Fair $0.01+0.0%

MAY.AX

Melbana Energy Limited

Energy / Oil & Gas E&PASX

$0.01

-0.00 (-7.69%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.01Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 20/D
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-49.0M · quality 50.0/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 30/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

20/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · MAY.AXLocal privado en este navegador · Melbana Energy Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$23M

P/E

6.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

2.1x

↓

ROE

5.8%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

MAY.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.006Periodo -94.3%
Fair value: $0.006

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

-21.35x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $3.3M · FCF $-69.6M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue———$10.4M—
Net Income$3.3M$3.3M$-1.0M$6.3M$-1.3M
EBITDA$3.8M$3.8M$-562650.00$6.5M$-1.3M
EPS0.000.00-0.000.00—
Gross Margin———100.0%—
Operating Margin———-31.3%—
Net Margin———60.9%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity——0.00——
Current Ratio1.201.20———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-69.6M$-69.6M$-49.0M$-41.3M$-9.6M
Returns
ROE5.8%5.8%-1.9%17.0%-17.9%
Valuation
P/E6.006.00—52.38—
EV/EBITDA2.112.11—45.48—
P/B0.360.365.648.928.17
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth433.3%433.3%-114.3%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-19.0%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.00

Spread vs growth

452.3%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-8.4%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.00

Spread vs growth

441.8%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

0.4%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.00

Spread vs growth

433.0%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -75.0%

Total return

-75.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.00 → 0.00

Residual

-75.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-75.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.