StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
MCA.BK$1.15+0.88%
Fair $1.15+0.0%

MCA.BK

MCA.BK

Communication Services / Advertising AgenciesThailand

$1.15

+0.01 (+0.88%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.15Fund rank 21/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 45/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 15%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-19.4M · quality 31.7/100

Data gap 21/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 11/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

45/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · MCA.BKLocal privado en este navegador · MCA.BK
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$265M

P/E

12.8x

↓

EV/EBITDA

7.0x

↓

ROE

5.8%

↑

Gross Margin

18.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$1
$1$2

TradingView lightweight chart

MCA.BK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.150Periodo -43.6%
Fair value: $1.150

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+30.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-1.8%

FCF / Net income

-0.79x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $818.2M · net income $18.5M · FCF $-14.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

18.9%-3.4% pts

Operating margin

3.2%-2.5% pts

Net margin

2.3%-2.2% pts

FCF margin

-1.8%-2.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$818.2M$818.2M$657.5M$471.1M$372.6M
Net Income$18.5M$18.5M$20.0M$25.1M$16.5M
EBITDA$31.0M$31.0M$29.2M$34.6M$25.0M
EPS——0.090.140.07
Gross Margin18.9%18.9%17.5%22.4%22.2%
Operating Margin3.2%3.2%3.7%6.4%5.7%
Net Margin2.3%2.3%3.0%5.3%4.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity——0.000.000.16
Current Ratio2.852.85———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-14.6M$-14.6M$-61.0M$-19.4M$1.5M
Returns
ROE5.8%5.8%6.5%8.4%16.8%
Valuation
P/E12.7812.7815.8918.43—
EV/EBITDA7.007.008.839.48—
P/B0.840.841.071.58—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth24.4%24.4%39.6%26.4%—
EPS Growth——-35.7%95.0%—
Dividend Yield3.9%3.9%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -1.1%

Total return

-1.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.09 → n/d

Residual

-5.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.9%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-5.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.