StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
MDX.V$0.06-8.33%
Fair $0.06+0.0%

MDX.V

MedX Health Corp

Healthcare / Medical DevicesTSXV

$0.06

-0.00 (-8.33%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.06Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 24/D
F-Score: 2/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-3.4M · quality 78.3/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 43/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

24/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · MDX.VLocal privado en este navegador · MedX Health Corp
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$18M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

64.6%

↑

Gross Margin

31.2%

↓

Debt/Equity

-0.82

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

MDX.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.055Periodo -86.3%
Fair value: $0.055

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-2.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-788.6%

FCF / Net income

0.59x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $473266.0 · net income $-6.3M · FCF $-3.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

31.2%-15.8% pts

Operating margin

-906.9%-149.3% pts

Net margin

-1329.2%-323.7% pts

FCF margin

-788.6%-240.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$473266.00$473266.00$489698.00$456088.00$510606.00
Net Income$-6.3M$-6.3M$-3.7M$-4.6M$-5.1M
EBITDA$-4.5M$-4.5M$-2.3M$-2.4M$-3.8M
EPS-0.02-0.02-0.01-0.02-0.03
Gross Margin31.2%31.2%39.7%40.7%47.0%
Operating Margin-906.9%-906.9%-470.4%-664.0%-757.6%
Net Margin-1329.2%-1329.2%-746.0%-1004.3%-1005.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-0.82-0.82-0.82-0.82-0.71
Current Ratio0.040.04———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.7M$-3.7M$-2.5M$-3.4M$-2.8M
Returns
ROE64.6%64.6%42.9%64.1%72.5%
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-3.4%-3.4%7.4%-10.7%—
EPS Growth-100.0%-100.0%50.0%33.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -38.9%

Total return

-38.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → -0.02

Residual

-38.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-38.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.