StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
MLARD.PA$200.00+0.00%
Fair $200.00+0.0%

MLARD.PA

Les Motocycles Ardoin Saint Amand & Cie Société Anonyme

Consumer Cyclical / Auto & Truck DealershipsParis

$200.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $200.00Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 27/D
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF n/d · quality 66.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 50/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

27/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 0.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · MLARD.PALocal privado en este navegador · Les Motocycles Ardoin Saint Amand & Cie Société Anonyme
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$7M

P/E

2000.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

98.9x

↑

ROE

0.1%

↓

Gross Margin

54.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.07

↓
52-Week Range$200
$170$204

TradingView lightweight chart

MLARD.PA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $200.00Periodo +1076.5%
Fair value: $200.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2023 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+1.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

—

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $103000.0 · net income $3724.0 · FCF —

2021-FY → 2023-FY

Gross margin

54.1%+7.3% pts

Operating margin

-37.9%+37.2% pts

Net margin

3.6%+63.5% pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$103000.00$103000.00$104000.00$101000.00
Net Income$3724.00$3724.00$-85458.00$-60473.00
EBITDA$51811.00$51811.00$-58787.00$-62389.00
Gross Margin54.1%54.1%36.6%46.8%
Operating Margin-37.9%-37.9%-90.8%-75.0%
Net Margin3.6%3.6%-82.2%-59.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.070.070.090.00
Returns
ROE0.1%0.1%-2.0%-1.4%
Valuation
P/E2000.002000.00——
EV/EBITDA98.8798.87——
P/B1.641.644.34—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-1.0%-1.0%3.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +0.0%

Total return

+0.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → n/d

Residual

+0.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+0.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.