StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
MLCAC.PA$15.20+0.00%
Fair $15.20+0.0%

MLCAC.PA

Lombard & Medot SA

Consumer Defensive / Beverages - Wineries & DistilleriesParis

$15.20

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $15.20Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 34/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF n/d · quality 56.0/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 50/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

34/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 0.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · MLCAC.PALocal privado en este navegador · Lombard & Medot SA
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$7M

P/E

108.6x

↑

EV/EBITDA

21.7x

↑

ROE

0.1%

↓

Gross Margin

20.8%

↓

Debt/Equity

1.13

↑
52-Week Range$15
$13$17

TradingView lightweight chart

MLCAC.PA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $15.20Periodo -59.0%
Fair value: $15.20

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+9.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

—

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $11.3M · net income $8815.0 · FCF —

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

20.8%+15.7% pts

Operating margin

7.8%+6.4% pts

Net margin

0.1%+1.5% pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$11.3M$11.3M$11.3M$11.3M$8.6M
Net Income$8815.00$8815.00$30920.00$-71914.00$-124289.00
EBITDA$1.1M$1.1M$868861.00$416800.00$316483.00
EPS——0.06-0.15—
Gross Margin20.8%20.8%15.7%12.4%5.2%
Operating Margin7.8%7.8%6.3%2.3%1.4%
Net Margin0.1%0.1%0.3%-0.6%-1.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.131.131.181.201.22
Current Ratio6.336.33———
Returns
ROE0.1%0.1%0.2%-0.5%-0.9%
Valuation
P/E108.57108.57249.90——
EV/EBITDA21.6921.6927.0553.8673.15
P/B0.540.540.560.520.49
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-0.5%-0.5%0.2%32.2%—
EPS Growth——143.0%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -9.0%

Total return

-9.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.06 → n/d

Residual

-9.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-9.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.