StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
MLCLP.PA$2.50-9.42%
Fair $2.50+0.0%

MLCLP.PA

Colipays Reunion Société anonyme

Consumer Cyclical / Internet RetailParis

$2.50

-0.26 (-9.42%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2.50Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 32/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-2.0M · quality 54.0/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 53/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

32/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

8/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 2Warnings: 1unknown: 2
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Limited financial history; valuation confidence should be treated as provisional. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -12.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · MLCLP.PALocal privado en este navegador · Colipays Reunion Société anonyme
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$5M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

8.2x

↓

ROE

-12.1%

↓

Gross Margin

12.3%

↓

Debt/Equity

1.44

↑
52-Week Range$3
$1$3

TradingView lightweight chart

MLCLP.PA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2.500Periodo -86.8%
Fair value: $2.500

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2024 · 1 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-6.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-55.2%

FCF / Net income

7.76x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.0M · net income $-211088.0 · FCF $-1.6M

2023-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

12.3%+28.5% pts

Operating margin

-15.4%+23.5% pts

Net margin

-7.1%+64.3% pts

FCF margin

-55.2%+21.8% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$3.0M$3.0M$3.2M
Net Income$-211088.00$-211088.00$-2.3M
EBITDA$749052.00$749052.00$-1.1M
Gross Margin12.3%12.3%-16.2%
Operating Margin-15.4%-15.4%-38.9%
Net Margin-7.1%-7.1%-71.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.441.442.08
Current Ratio0.880.88—
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.6M$-1.6M$-2.4M
Returns
ROE-12.1%-12.1%-115.5%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA8.258.25—
P/B2.662.662.19
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-6.2%-6.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +313.2%

Total return

+313.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → n/d

Residual

+313.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+313.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.